Archive for the ‘Recent Articles’ Category

Tuesday, April 23, 2013 @ 06:04 PM
posted by Rudi

off
Sunday, March 31, 2013 @ 01:03 PM
posted by Rudi

off
Friday, January 4, 2013 @ 01:01 PM
posted by Rudi

I am outraged and laughing at the manipulations and fear tactics of the FDA. It just posted a Friday Food Safety notice to be wary of raw sprouts because of the risk of food borne illness such as salmonella and E. coli. They claim that there have been 30 reported outbreaks within the past 16 years and that the problem is with the seed itself. They caution even home grown sprouts including alfalfa, clover, radish, and mung beans.) They also caution people with challenged immune systems, children and pregnant women to not eat sprouts raw or lightly cooked.

Such BS. The problems come with the chicken, bat, and cow manure in the sol used or leaking downstream into water sources used. This comment is based on 30 reports over 16 years – what about the 100 million plus instances where people have eaten sprouts and not only boosted their immune systems and helped challenge certain diseases but also went away healthy with smiles. I wonder if the FDA has ever posted reports from years ago that a rumored 240 deaths a day are traced to meat consumption –opps, gotta be careful of the meat industry.

The POP Campaign is conducting more research to address the details in case this mushrooms into a huge strategy of control or regulation – or setting the stage for massive GE planting of sprouts.

http://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/types/fruits/sprouts.html?utm_medium=govdelivery&utm_source=campaign&utm_campaign=food-safe-fridays&utm_content=sprouts

off
Friday, May 18, 2012 @ 03:05 PM
posted by Mik and Rudi

off
Thursday, February 9, 2012 @ 11:02 AM
posted by Mik and Rudi

Action Alert for another huge step towards freedom and health- the POP Campaign has been a strong advocate for Genetically Engineered labeling – we are asking everyone to contact their Senators and House of Representatives. Ask them to cosign this Bicameral Letter to the FDA “requesting” that the FDA mandate  (GE) labeling of all food. (We will get all of the phone numbers up later.) We are working with the Just Label it Coalition and others on this effort – go team.

off
Sunday, January 23, 2011 @ 01:01 PM
posted by Mik and Rudi

The grassroots POP Campaign keeps our voices and choices alive and organic food and standards pure — providing a new Consensus Platform for policy-makers and launching a MOMS4POP initiative in 2011. Be involved! Read below and go to popcampaign.org.

The Climate of Food for 2011 — Life After S. 510

It is essential to constantly remind ourselves that the politics of food are driven by the power of self-interest. Too often these interests are profit-driven, with huge appetites for our pocketbooks as their feasts. Well-financed challenges these days are unprecedented, carefully crafted, and massively deployed.

Most evident has been the inevitable (as of the time of this article) passage of the Food Safety Bill.

The mid-term change in Congress, with 40% of the Senate and 20% of the House membership considered freshman — and with its growth towards the conservative movement — presented a new stage for fresh perspectives regarding many regulations and restrictions on our food and the price tag exceeding $1.6 Billion over five years. It was hoped that this change would greatly help health freedom, dietary supplements and food dialogue. Yet, the “sweet spots” of food regulation regarding safety, control, and choice restriction was too tempting and bridged the gap between the parties. The food fight continues with bipartisan mouths still chewing on passage issues.

Nevertheless, the POP Campaign will continue to carve out a crucial watchdog role — being defensive, aware of tactics, outbreaks, and orchestrated headliners that will set the stage for public sentiment and reactionary new lawmaking regarding the regulatory process — and offensive, developing creative strategies such as living, quality organic food educational guidelines for Congressional decision makers, a consensus food platform, and the MOMS4POP initiative (described below). In this manner, with all of us taking a stand together, 2011 can be a pivotal banner year for food quality and dietary supplement freedom on a stage where optimism and effective action play a role, effecting a tipping point toward solid victories.

A Key Driver to Sustainable Action

“Living as if the future matters,” shouted sixteen-year-old high school student Alec Loorz in his speech at the Bioneers Conference in November, 2010, on the iMatter March.

Millions of Americans and people around the globe are taking steps to improve their well-being, life force, and health. This is a force to be
acknowledged. Our hunger for the truth about what we put in our mouths is outpacing our appetites for garbage.

Organic is becoming more mainstream.

We are turning to natural remedies, organic products, living food, and
quality lifestyles. Through books like Supplements Exposed by Dr. Brian Clement, we are discovering the hidden secrets behind the industry and what we buy. Concerns about the costs of organic food are rising with our demand; yet we continue to insist upon our healthy choices. We seek to express our views at all levels of national, state, local and family governments and engage in “healthy eating” discussions with everyone we meet.

Clearly, we can no longer stand by and wait — especially with S. 510. Viable solutions still exist. There are options for farmers, suppliers, and consumers. The biggest question we must ask for our children and ourselves is: “Are we living as if the future matters?” If the answer is “yes,” there will always be resolve, answers, and hope.

POP Campaign’s 2011 Proactive

Strategies and Initiatives

In the context of passing the Food Safety Bill, there was much discussion and many points of view that were expressed, ultimately defining the instructions of the letter of the law. This is referred to as the spirit of the law and intent of the law. The POP Campaign will play an important role in sifting through Congressional comments on record to find statements that can strengthen positions for food freedom and choice. These foundation-setting statements will be used as markers for keeping the FDA and other regulatory agencies on track in their policy-making throughout the pivotal 2011 year.

One of the primary signals that has been sent with the political change in Washington is acknowledgement of a gap between what constituents want and which direction we’re sailing. Food issues are non-partisan, but the different “food” winds in Congress still must be captured at this high policy making level to navigate our coarse correctly. The setting still presents an opportunity to discuss and reframe issues around organic food and healthy supplements, re-surface common sense solutions and options in biocompatible approaches to farming, promote further education and local responsibility of growers, and formulate new laws and policies that support a healthy future and free choice. This is the basic consensus of many of us, with some thoughts below regarding the POP Campaign strategies and issues.

Participating in the Orientation of New Members of Congress

One of the POP Campaign’s main agendas is to provide Congress, especially new members, the knowledge, examples, suggestions, and options so that members can formulate any other food policy related bills or amendments that is truly health-driven and has our interests in mind. For every Member, not just the newly elected, the Congressional policy-making process and the sheer volumes of analyses and bundles of daily documents, complex language, and huge volume of pages of the bills themselves, sometimes thousands of pages, is extremely overwhelming to manage and understand. The self-interests are complex, camouflaged in the grass, and hidden behind crafted language. Decision-making by category and relying upon the research of other legislators and special interests is the only anchor for many legislators — they just cannot do it all or digest most of it. Yes, Congressional indigestion exists!

You can participate with the POP Campaign as a remedy for this indigestion. We propose a consensus Congressional framework document. (Please see the article by Beth Clay, “The Washington Report,” in Healing Our World Volume 30, Issue 4 for more details.) This consensus document can serve as a food guide to help members discern issues and make good policy decisions. It will be simple and easy to follow with the necessary backup information. We will still remain knee-deep in discussions, work with allies, and continue to put together in-depth white papers, clarify issues, and have pointed conversations with legislators. Since nearly 100% of the research results and studies that are presented are influenced by big money and whoever backs the study, the proposed consensus viewpoints will serve as the lenses of truth to filter the facts and set the framework for more balanced conversations and decisions. To do this, the POP Campaign will initiate a series of powerful, yet simple, online surveys to gather information from you including some of the following concepts — accurate labeling, preserving choices, pure raw food options, decision making, transparency. Stay tuned.

Options: Facing Issues Head-on…and telling the truth as fast as you can!
Fortified with your brilliant survey answers, the Pop Campaign’s intention is to be present and address all living food and organic issues. We will face these issues head-on, utilizing our grassroots-built body of evidence and offering true “common sense” options to policy-makers.
For example, at the Bioneers Conference at the end of 2010, John Warner, one of the pioneers of “green chemistry,” in a discussion of bio-mimicry, stated that “nature is the highest teacher” — this is it’s destiny and its miracle — so let it be a clear measure. The comedic tragedy of food and supplements is that industry and big business spend millions to improve
and reassemble nature’s deepest molecules to create bigger profits “just because we can.” When this happens with our food, the original instructions are interfered with and the vital life force is compromised. Nature seeds itself, grows, nourishes and adapts — this is its truth. By aligning the integrity of green chemistry with common sense solutions, once and for all, we can establish a constituent-backed toxicology for foods. Do we know kids are obese? We know how they get that way. We do know who is lying and who is not. We know what pollutes our fields. We know what weakens us. To know this is to be “bio-smart.” To ignore this is to be reckless. To weave off this course in food policy-making may simply be morally wrong and criminally negligent once the truth is known. We will simply present this information.

Sorting through the nuts and bolts of a “bio-smart” healthy policy that reflects the natural processes will offer a new norm that reflects a true ecological fecundity in the national food production and supply. This is the “re-think” that is possible when facing issues head-on. A “bio-smart” policy approach will frame the power and quality of food production that “Preserves the Organic Power” of nature’s food supply and strengthens our course towards healthy living.

Preventative measures in one industry can greatly reduce safety concerns for organics such as egg recalls and cattle manure contamination. Therefore, another notable example and clear game-changer is the bio-smart Stonyfield Farm and Organic Valley Cooperative stories — www.stonyfield.com. Whether or not one supports dairy and meat, in our conversations with Gary Hirshberg, Michale Ableman and staff, the POP Campaign lauds these efforts as a model example of how organic production, distribution, and waste can be handled in the deepest green and most conscious ways. This is done through personal responsibility, merging technology and eco-enhancing practices to the detail, while being extraordinarily successful. This is the kind of blueprint model beneficial for all growers of food as well for Congressional policy makers. These options must become alternatives to regulatory infringement and restriction.

A Human Rights Issue: Healthy Choice v Junk Food: An American

Entitlement and a Challenge

Congressional efforts around food policy, especially regarding safety, can have an underpinning of destabilization of our freedom of choice and quality of food. In a funny way, it reflects a cultural erosion of the basic fabric of our food choices, and our basic right to choice must be fought for and protected.

Although many of us choose organic, many Americans are still attracted to cheap and toxic food. The basic fabric is in all of us who have been contaminated internally and blinded by our habits and “bad” food choices, now or in the past. There has been a rapid rate of food changes in our country over the past decades, like an undertow, and we have gotten caught in it. Sodas and sugar are so woven into our culture, our survival can become a flight to and fight for our junk food. Corporations love the fact that we eat junk food for much of our lives, then become even more dependent on their patented drugs, and finally help fuel the medical system. We are no longer aware of the degree of toxicity in our bodies. We are numb but still have fun.

Recently, an HHI Health Educator, one week into the program, stood up and humorously shared with the group that she still had a chocolate chip cookie in her car and said, “It calls out to me in the middle of the night.” Everyone laughed. Even after learning the truth — and experiencing a healthy diet — chemical cravings still cry out. In our core relationship with our food, we still witness the blind effects of our toxic past. Our habits put us at risk.

Two worlds clash and fight within us.

Freedom of choice may mean that it is time to coexist in the two food worlds. For those adults who prefer to choose toxic foods and defy healthy living, they will be allowed. For those who choose to eat well, and avoid becoming an endangered species, they will be free to do so. For those who want everyone to eat toxic food, the battle-lines must be drawn harshly — both on a national and international level as well as in our personal lives. The playing field must be leveled.

The freedom of choice for the young people and children may be different. The real safety and protection concern surrounds their education — or lack of education — about food. Adults too often cave to forces around them: convenience and habit, marketing and greed, cartoon commercials, limited parental time, and let their children grow up with the same mindset, beliefs, and addictive hungers for toxic foods that they have. It may be time to just “Stop It!” It is very important for children to be given the opportunity to eat healthy and grow up healthy. While many children around the world go with too little food, too many children in our country and other developed nations continue to be wrongly-fed. The right to healthy food, knowledge, and choices for children is a human rights issue and a civil rights issue for all of us. The POP Campaign intends to strengthen our rights by gathering more input from all of you and proposing the following actions:

• A UN Amendment to the Human Rights Declaration pertaining to the right to Choose Quality Food — including backup country legislation.
Formulate a National Children’s Food Rights Declaration that young children at an early age are to be taught the truth about healthy food and given options.

• That young children be protected under the law from being given GMO food.
Establish an International Organic Living Foods Week in every country in the world where education about health and quality food choices are presented.

• One Blind Curve — It is going to become a local food fight — get ready.
Codex continues to be a threat. Some products that have become issues are Noni and Kava, for example. More research is being done on these. Codex also has sent out a survey to all member countries “to gauge the use of Codex standards and related texts at the national and regional levels,” as well as to learn about nutritional issues within the region which were described as, “obesity, nutritional profiles, and any public health-oriented actions taken, including the use of nutritional labeling and claims.” This means that the long arm is reaching into our backyards and is setting the stage for action.

• It is important to pay attention to what local governments might do in response to Codex — especially at the state level. The issue of climate change has surfaced in discussions at Codex meetings and among staff — which is an opportunity to bring forth food related growing issues, “bio-smart” farming, and proceed with discussions about sustainability.

MOMS4POP Launches

Hundreds of thousands of moms in this country are getting outraged about their food choices. This has ignited a fire that the POP Campaign intends to fuel. The moms of this country are the ones who can set the blueprint for healthy food choices and food quality in 2011. They are the major stakeholders and have a growing hunger for organics. They want to bring into their daily lives the honest truth about food, effecting “common sense” shopping methods and prudent food choices. Nearly 80% of the people who shop in this country are women — and most of them are mothers.

While we do not have the funding for millions of dollars in research,
we will trust the instincts of moms across this country. Informed moms
are truth gauges. Mom really is the one who truly cares. It is our mothers who gave us our first feeding experience — all of us. We value what she says — at least to a certain age — and we trust her voice.
We know the power of this self-interest. Every mom wants their child and family to stay away from that which harms them — it is instinctual. Moms who stand up against toxic food and for organic and living food can make a huge difference. Moms tell good stories and challenge myths. We are asking moms to speak up and show up for POP — Preserving Organic Power. We are launching MOMS4POP.

Please join us — visit www.POPcampaign.org.

MOMS4POP will:

• Support a place where moms can share their stories and strategies around healthy living food and elevate awareness.

• Engage in “Shop Talk” — moms share what they know with at least one other cart-pusher in the market by pointing out “bad” food and
suggesting healthier options.

• Hand out a simple information card on the same healthy issues that
the POP Campaign will hand out
to Congressional members.

MOMS4POP will support each other — and the POP Campaign — through their efforts and networks and become a driving, self-sufficient economic force.
MOMS4POP will hold politicians and policy makers accountable by showing up en masse when necessary.

A call on mothers to take a stand against toxic food and for organic, healthy food.

MOMS4POP will schedule Organic Mondays — eating organic is a health event.

Myth-busting evening discussions, lunches and meetup groups and share true stories of what is possible.

Policy and regulations are based upon attitudes and beliefs, as well as facts. Your voices are very important in holding the FDA accountable to our organic food and freedom of choice principles. We have worked well with Congress and will go back to them if the FDA goes too far in its regulatory process. We intend to continue breaking new ground in our country, showing the benefits of living, healthy, organic food access and choices. It is essential that you participate and work with us to educate policy-makers at every level and support each other.

Please donate your time, resources and money.

POP Campaign
20 Sunnyside Ave, Suite A 113
Mill Valley, CA 94941

Visit www.POPcampaign.org, call (415) 999-9414 or email rudi@popcampaign.org.

off
Friday, May 7, 2010 @ 02:05 PM
posted by Mik and Rudi
The POP Campaign is a recently launched, grassroots effort to provide a powerful leadership presence on the national and global stages regarding organic food and supplements. The objective of this effort is to keep our voices and choices alive, our standards pure, and everyone informed on related issues and effective action.
.
It is our strong belief that the right focus, prudent alliances, participation of motivated citizens and a collaborative effort can advance our health freedom forward through the maze of regulations, guidelines and laws surrounding food safety, organic standards and dietary supplements. By “organically” adapting responses to legislative agendas, political changes, counter proposals, and special interests with remarkable speed and depth, along with leveraging our collective passion and influence, we can realize victories and preserve gains already made for health freedom and choices.
.
Recent Victories

On a shoestring budget, we hired lobbyists Beth Clay and Clinton Miller to personally contact members of Congress so they might witness our passionate commitment to healthy eating and to viable “common-sense” positions.  What seemed impossible has resulted in significant successes— we influenced wording in the Senate Chairman’s Mark on Food Safety S. 510; helped frame and participated in the rigorous dialogue pertaining to Senator McCain’s Dietary Supplements bill so that he understood its ramifications and withdrew his own sponsorship (huge victory); addressed Codex influence on domestic crops and supported FDA accountability reporting measures; presented the “POP” and “Codex” amendments; and contributed to push-back efforts,information sharing, and personal stories to leverage our influence on policy.
.
Action Plan

Moving forward, we find ourselves making difficult conversations more simple, complex issues clear, and shaping more meaningful thinking on key issues. We continue monitoring the bills and actions mentioned above. We will be taking a deeper look at an acceptable definition of “organic” and the concept of “science-based” standards. We do not agree with “one-size-fits-all” rules and the manipulations of the term “science based” to strengthen self-serving objectives. Paying attention to some of the upcoming sunsets on banned substances in organic farming is also essential –stay tuned.

“Green Your SPIRIT, America! We are getting healthier.
The times, they ARE a changin’… ~Mikaële Holzer
.
.
Major activities will include:

•   Collective Impact: Leverage our numbers, resources, and experts
•   “Science based” and “organic” debates: Steer the dialogue correctly and fairly
•   Codex Harmonization: Influence its global impact through education; stop any national bleed-through, take positions at FDA and Congressional hearings
Continued Monitoring: HR 458, HR 185, and sunsets on farming additives Collective Impact
.
“We can be effective as long as we are not lullabied into a dream state that everything is fine –it’s not. We need your support and your voice more than ever before!”  ~Brian Clement.
..
.
Collective Impact
.
There are many indications Americans are becoming more focused on their health.
  • Celebrities flock to the Hippocrates Health Institute boosting their health, beauty and longevity.
  • Guests on the Oprah Show passionately share healthy eating tips and discuss America’s obesity epidemic.
  • Food Inc. receives an Academy Award nomination! Catherine Austin Fitz, national financial advisor, says that ten years ago she could not have imagined speaking on national radio about personal gardening and organic food, even broaching the conversation that “food is medicine”.
  • Jamie Oliver invades the most “unhealthy U.S. city” in his reality show to change eating habits in a Midwestern town.
  • Daily, from New Jersey to Kansas City to Boise to Bakersfield, eco-moms buy one or two new GMO-free items for their children.
  • Farmland Inc. reports that the ROI for farms that convert to organic is minimally 8% above traditional crops.
  • Organic food and beverages in the United States have grown into big business with sales from $1,000,000,000 in 1990 to an estimated $22,900,000,000 in 2008.
  • Mainstream’s passion for organics is skyrocketing. This is our biggest asset that can be leveraged… you are developing quality standards daily, one food choice at a time.
.
“Victory lies in leveraging who we are as a health-conscious Community; strengthening our voices and focusing our passions, finances and expertise at all levels is the greatest power block in the history of this country. We are our greatest assets.” ~Rudi Leonardi
.
.
To the choir: You are the path-makers. Obviously, we have a strong, unique connection to our organic food—a degree of intimacy that leads us to grand rhapsody and poetry. We can still experience child-like wonder over luscious natural tastes and smile ourselves into bliss. Our organic food crowns us a champion with each delicious bite. We have researched, documented, fine-tuned and learned how to grow food sustainably, efficiently, and cost effectively. We cultivate an intimacy with the earth and its harvests that is just nitty-gritty delicious and healthy. We are alive and vibrant! We must leverage our passion in a huge way to do what is necessary to take our leadership to the next level—showing up “BIG” to correctly address major issues.
.
“ In all my years in Washington, I have learned that you, the people, can influence the laws when you are willing to speak out with clarity.”  ~Beth Clay
.
.

“Science-based” Standards and the “Organic” Definition Debates
.
The use of the term “science-based” minimum standards is dangerous and one of the most tricky quagmires to maneuver. This is a term Congress increasingly uses when instructing the FDA or Administration. “It has no clear definition in statute and is used to exclude traditional use theories and practices, minority opinions and other information not in line with the status quo objectives,” states Beth Clay. It also sets the stage to undermine decades of progress on organic standards that, up to this point, have prevented the intrusion of pesticides and chemicals.

Section 419 of S. 510 requires the Secretary to propose and enact regulations to establish “science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities for which the Secretary has determined that such standards minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences…”

Applying “science based” is an immediate red flag. Once the door is open, it can be a Pandora’s box. Institutional and corporate agendas have no tolerance for anything not aligned with their own objectives. Scientific arguments can be a “tit-for-tat” chess game where each fact is countered by another, until a stale mate is reached. Although results may be clearly scientific, built upon years of case studies, and very pervasive, the valuable information is simply ignored and gives way to an economic-political over-ride. Those “in charge” reassert their claims to academic territory, are stubbornly unwilling to relinquish positions, demand enormous volumes of evidence, and build cases addressing symptoms rather than the source of problems—wanting nothing that upsets the apple cart.
.
“ I am concerned that the good intentions of the Senate will be used to undermine future access to true organic foods…. (with) the use of the term ‘science-based’ in setting a minimum standard…” ~ Clinton Miller
.

The POP Campaign, along with the best health experts in the world, is challenging many basic assumptions and demanding to be included at every stage of policy development—on every committee, at every hearing, and on every working group across the country. We are pitting traditional uses and
practices against special interests. There will be victories, but we will be rigorously challenged.
.
A Smorgasbord of Organic Definitions
.
We can’t just walk into a grocery store anymore and simply buy food—we find ourselves being forced to legislate our basic rights all the way down the aisle as we choose what to put into our mouths. There is no shortage of the garden variety of disagreements, misunderstandings, self-interest, anxieties, confusion, complexity and deep seeded opinions. When asked, “what is organic?”, we quickly think simple, pure, healthful, whole, and close to nature food—grown with no synthetic fertilizers, drugs, hormones, additives, radiation or pasteurization. This makes sense—a standard supported by our experiences and our dream of what we want for our children. Even Thomas Jefferson stated,“the laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of our minds.” Why can’t modern laws and institutions represent our trend toward a more sustainable existence?
.
What is the Organic Chess Board?
.
A complex of U.S. laws and policy—Organic food laws are defined under Title 21 of the United States Code (USC). Federal agencies develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) regarding the implementation and management of laws, detailed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA), enacted under Title 21 of the 1990 Farm Bill, establishes uniform national standards for the production and handling of foods labeled as “organic.” It authorized a new USDA National Organic Program (NOP) to set national standards for the production, handling, and processing
of organically grown agricultural products, including The POP Campaign, along with the best health experts in the world, is challenging many basic assumptions and demanding to be included at every stage of policy development—on every committee, at every hearing, and on every working group across the country. We are pitting traditional uses andpractices against special interests. There will be victories, but we will be rigorously challenged.
.

A Smorgasbord of Organic Definitions
.
We can’t just walk into a grocery store anymore and simply buy food—we find ourselves being forced to legislate our basic rights all the way down the aisle as we choose what to put into our mouths. There is no shortage of the garden variety of disagreements, misunderstandings, self-interest, anxieties, confusion, complexity and deep seeded opinions. When asked, “what is organic?”, we quickly think simple, pure, healthful, whole, and close to nature food—grown with no synthetic fertilizers, drugs, hormones, additives, radiation or pasteurization. This makes sense—a standard supported by our experiences and our dream of what we want for our children. Even Thomas Jefferson stated,“the laws and institutions must go hand in hand withthe progress of our minds.” Why can’t modern laws and institutions represent our trend toward a more sustainable existence?
.
What is the Organic Chess Board?
.
A complex of U.S. laws and policy—Organic food laws are defined under Title 21 of the United States Code (USC). Federal agencies develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) regarding the implementation and management of laws, detailed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA), enacted under Title 21 of the 1990 Farm Bill, establishes uniform national standards for the production and handling of foods labeled as “organic.” It authorized a new USDA National Organic Program (NOP) to set national standards for the production, handling, and processingof organically grown agricultural products, including overseeing the mandatory certification of organic production. The Act established the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), which advises the Secretary of Agriculture in setting the standards upon which the NOP is based. Producers who meet standards set by the NOP may label their products as “USDA Certified Organic.” Are you dizzy yet?

“Organic” as a qualifier, must specify: ecological production; biodiversity enhancement, biological cycles and soil activity; responsible labeling; materials used; and the balance of natural systems. It addresses: the absence of residues and pesticides; minimal pollution from water, food handlers, and processors; and how to grow organic agriculture to optimize health. Produce can be called organic and still contain 10% other ingredients. The definition needs refinement and must have sticking power at all levels—in spite of the ambition for big bucks via Big Farm Industry.

The “Better Living through Chemistry” post-war, old school attitude still drives these definitions and a “one size fits all” approach to “science-based” food standards. As in any chess game, the first opening move is calculated to gain a maximum advantage; we plan to take these opening moves and realize significant victories:

»»A Call to Action: This is such a Paul Revere statement but it is appropriate—“The inevitable is coming! The inevitable is coming!” There are many sub-policy discussions, FDA hearings, and sunset clauses in the Organic Food Act; we need to prepare well.

»»Take Charge of our own Standards: A National People’s / Experts Health Summit is in order where information would be consolidated and distilled into
reports for presentations.

»»A Healthy Tax: Consider a healthy tax on all food, especially vegetables, fruits, herbs, nuts and seeds that are not 100% organic, the proceeds of which will go to community school lunches and healthy local educational funds

“ We are not dogs at the end of a chain with only a bark—we can have bite. If we stand up and leverage what we have, collectively, we can make a huge difference.” ~ Rudi Leonardi

..
Harmonization of Codex
.

The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) is an intergovernmental body with over 170 members, within the Joint Food Standards Program established by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), with the purpose of “protecting the health of consumers and ensuring fair practices in the food trade.” The Commission also promotes coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and nongovernmental organizations. There are general, commodity, regional committees and task forces involved.
.
Codex is the code of rules over nutrients, supplements, food, herbs, nuts and fruit. Codex standards have been dictated, written, argued and pressured by global corporations and larger governments that seek greater compliance, uniformity, and control. NAFTA, CAFTA, the UN, WHO and the WTO have adapted codex standards; every major piece of legislation in the U.S. that may bump up against the scope of any of these bodies and or treaties has a Codex provision included to ensure “harmony.” The FDA is one of the enforcers of Codex and has failed to protect our needs“…from dangerous drugs, genetically modified foods, dangerous pesticides and other chemicals in the food supply. Meanwhile they waste public funds attacking safe, healthy foods and dietary supplements,” as one Congressman states.
.
No institutional arrogance or strength can match our numbers and pooled talent. Requests for consumer input are being published and the POP Campaign will submit positions. Our lobbyist, Beth Clay, once was a national representative to Codex committees and understands the inner
workings and navigation of the system—this is a huge plus for the POP Campaign.
.
We cannot do this alone—we need ideas, resources, support, and participation from you and your contacts—celebrities, songwriters, producers, poets and other influential individuals. We are also seeking health experts, talented\ technicians, researchers and volunteers. We most importantly need monetary support. Look at our shoestring victories and imagine how much we can accomplish with a little more help! Please donate HERE. For more information, call (415) 999-9414 or email info@popcampaign.org.


off