Exciting Pre-Launch: MOMS4POP supports the education and research of The POP Campaign. MOMS4POP is a fundraising strategy where Moms can support the research and educational efforts of the POP Campaign while establishing a revenue stream for themselves.
see http://moms4pop.org Dr Gabriel Cousens and Dr Brian Clement – Geneticall Engineered Food Linked with Iodine Deficiency and Congenital Birth Defects: Toxic Halogens called “salts” hidden behind the GE non-disclosure veil. by Rabbi Gabriel Cousens, MD, MD(H), Dr. Brian Clement, Nonnie Crystal and Rudhi Lenardi (POP Campaign)
As pioneers of the vibrant, alive blueprint for health at the Tree of Life Center U.S. and Hippocrates Health Institute, The POP Campaign strives to protect the healthy lifestyle threshold against the tsunami of genetically modified organisms (GMO) for the article see: http://moms4pop.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Mark Kastel, 608-625-2042
Unveiled: GMO Labeling Opponents
Come Out of the Shadows
Natural/Organic Brands No Longer Hiding
Behind Lobbying Organization
CORNUCOPIA, WI: Proposition I-522, a citizen’s initiative on the November 5 ballot in Washington state that would mandate clear labeling of genetically engineered (GE) ingredients on food packages, has become the most expensive initiative campaign in the state’s history. The high-priced battleground is pitting consumer and farmer advocates against multi-billion-dollar agribusiness corporations.
A number of new opponents to the GMO food labeling proposal were recently revealed following the release of their names by the Grocery Manufacturers Association(GMA), a national business lobbying organization. The GMA had been, apparently in violation of state election law, hiding the identity of its donors who had provided more than $7.2 million to fight the consumer’s right to know what is in their food. The disclosure came shortly after Washington’s Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a lawsuit demanding the GMA reveal the identity of its secret donors.
With the outing of the GMA’s donors, The Cornucopia Institute has released an updated infographic detailing the financial expenditures of corporate and organizational supporters and opponents of I-522.
“Consumers might be surprised to find out that some of their favorite organic and natural brands, hiding behind their lobbyist, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, are contributing bushel baskets of cash towards thwarting their right to make informed choices in the supermarket,” says Mark Kastel, Cornucopia’s Codirector.
A similar GMO labeling measure, Prop 37, was narrowly defeated in California last year, with GMA, Monsanto and their allies pouring more than $46 million into their campaign and outspending labeling supporters by five to one. Many prominent organic and natural brands were also exposed in California by Cornucopia for their opposition to GMO food labeling.
“We think the bad press and consumer outrage that many of the GMA member companies received in California, like Kellogs (Kashi), General Mills (Cascadian Farms/Muir Glen) and Smucker’s (Santa Cruz and Knudsen), led to the decision to try to clandestinely hide under the GMA’s cloak with its secret donor approach,” noted Kastel.
The Cornucopia infographic also outlines dozens of organic brands that have heavily contributed to the YES on I-522 campaign, including Dr Bronner’s, Nature’s Path, Annie’s, Stonyfield Farm and Nutiva. It is thought that after the dust settled in California, these groups gained respect and market share after some of the prominent, agribusiness-owned brands lost favor with politically savvy consumers.
A number of prominent organizations have also substantially contributed in support of consumer rights, including the Organic Consumers Association, Center for Food Safety, Mercola.com, Presence Marketing, PCC Natural Markets and Food Democracy Now!.
Earlier this year, the GMA publicly scrubbed its website of its members, a move thought by many to be an effort to mask which corporations/brands were helping underwrite corporate donations against I-522. They weren’t, however, able to remove this web archive detailing their membership.
“In addition to the many companies supporting a YES vote on I-522, there are thousands of individuals making small donations to fund the pro-labeling campaign,” said Goldie Caughlan, a retired nutrition educator for PCC Natural Markets in Seattle and former member of the National Organic Standards Board. “Out-of-state interests, like Monsanto and the many identified GMA members, are flooding our airwaves with misleading ads telling Washington residents how to vote,” Caughlan added.
Mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food at the state level is viewed as a watershed event by many industry observers, given the inaction on the popular proposal at the federal level – with polls showing as high as a 90% in support. Lobbyists for Monsanto, its biotech allies, and GMA in particular, have been credited with bottlenecking a federal labeling law.
After the industry advertising blitz, the most recent polling of Washington state voters indicates a tightening race on the I-522 initiative, with a narrow majority supporting labeling of GMO food ingredients. Opponents of the measure have raised in excess of $17.1 million. The GMA’s share of the NO vote dollar alone, at $7.2 million, is greater than all of the money raised by I-522 supporters, who have collected nearly $6.9 million in favor of a YES vote.
“Consumers and food citizens are increasingly interested in ‘voting with their forks,’ and many want to support companies that share their values,” observes Jason Cole, a researcher for Cornucopia who compiled the data for the infographic. “We think these conscious eaters will appreciate the infographic created by Cornucopia to help them make their purchasing decisions.”
SMART VIDEO that supports the POP Campaign’s efforts to end the promiscuity tendencies of Genetic Engineered Crops raping our minerals and nutrients from our organic plants. Save our children, jail glyphosate as the perpetrator – Dr. Huber is a solid scientist – stay tuned Dr. Huber has the depth of 50 years as a researcher – he underscores the huge economic monopoly and money making values behind GE food at the expense of us humans as experiments. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrq_1ovWlVE
The POP Campaign Co-Hosts Dr. Brian Clement in Seattle on July 25th – getting traction on GMO Labeling Prop 522
FINAL LET’S GET FOLKS THERE: The POP Campaign is co-hosting Dr. Brian Clement with the yummy THRIVE Restaurant in Seattle. Dr. Brian, Director of the Hippocrates Health Institute, will be speaking about the healthy, vibrant lifestyle of living foods and updates on GMO Labeling and the Proposition 522 Labeling Efforts int he State of Washington. An amazing opportunity to learn cutting edge health information and elevate your game. USE PROMO CODE FOR A DISCOUNT : THRIVE20 – BASTYR UNIVERSITY AUDITORIUM – sign up: @http://www.generationthrive.com/events Dr. Brian Clement flyer
We are powerful as a group and must continue to educate people to stand up for their rights to label Genetically Engineered Foods – the GMO industry has been nervous and met in Washington to discuss ways to fight back, throw more money to counter efforts and to strategize for a national labeling bill – we wait and ask for support for our efforts. See the article in the Hill:
Key summit set in genetically modified food label fight – By Ben Goad –
Major players in the food industry have scheduled a crucial meeting for next week that could become a turning point in the regulatory battle over genetically modified foods.
Challenges to the use of biotechnology have created an “unprecedented period of turmoil” for food producers, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) said in a letter circulated among trade groups that was obtained by The Hill.
“We have reached a pivotal point in this effort and believe now is the time to bring together a broad coalition to confront these challenges,” the GMA wrote in the letter, which invited CEOs and top industry officials to a Wednesday summit in Washington.
Just how the food industry might move forward appears up for debate. Though organizers of the GMA summit were tight-lipped, advocates and industry officials said the options could ultimately range from a coordinated attack against labels to acceptance of a national standard.
The GMA’s membership list includes more than 300 companies, including food giants Kraft Foods, Coca Cola and General Mills. The group declined to discuss the meeting or whether it would propose a particular strategy.
“As the policy debate surrounding this issue moves forward, GMA will continue to work with its supply chain partners to inform lawmakers and consumers about the significant negative impacts such labeling requirements will have on both businesses and consumers,” the group said in a written statement to The Hill.
Opponents of mandatory labeling argue that foods made with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are perfectly healthy and indistinguishable from “natural” products. Labels could create a false perception that the foods are somehow inferior, they say, and create a stigma that causes prices to rise.
For years, farmers have planted herbicide resistant or “roundup ready” corn, cotton and soybeans that can be easily sprayed for weeds. The genetically modified crops are used in a variety of popular processed foods, including soft drinks, margarine and breakfast cereal.
Food safety and public interest groups question claims that GMOs are safe, arguing the science is inconclusive. They have pressed for all GMO foods to be labeled so that consumers are aware of what that they’re eating.
The fight over labels is increasingly being waged at the state level — and at substantial cost to foodstuff manufacturers.
Last year, major chemical and food companies spent more than $40 million in California to defeat a ballot measure that called for mandatory labels of all scientifically engineered foods sold in the state.
Similar labeling proposals have popped up in more than two-dozen states and in Congress, and the industry group says it cannot afford to fight them all.
“Today consumers have a high degree of confidence in the safety of the U.S. food supply,” the GMA wrote in the letter. But that confidence could be eroded, the GMA warned, by 25 proposals pending in state legislatures, a ballot initiative on deck in Washington State, and the federal push for mandatory labels.
Thus far, two state legislatures — Maine and Connecticut — have approved legislation requiring labels on genetically modified foods. Governors in both states are expected to sign the bills, according to Colin O’Neil, director of government affairs at the Center for Food Safety.
O’Neil’s group has pressed the Food and Drug Administration to act unilaterally on regulations for GMO labels since a legislative mandate is unlikely to pass Congress. The FDA has not responded to the request.
Interests on both sides of the debate are watching the Washington initiative closely. Adoption of state labeling laws could subject food companies to a patchwork of regulations that would be far more costly than a federal standard, O’Neil said.
“These companies would like to see any language that would preempt state law,” he said. “A federal standard would likely do that.”
O’Neil said industry concerns over state level action, therefore, have long begged the question: “When does the labeling fight come to D.C.?”
Some industry sources said they viewed Wednesday’s meeting as a significant event, but declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issues at hand.
Officials from the Produce Marketing Association were among those invited, though they would not be able to attend, spokeswoman Meg Miller said.
As for the group’s expectations of what the result might be: “We don’t have any at this point,” she said.
URGENT * URGENT * URGENT GMO ISSUE IN CONGRESS – CALL SENATORS AND – FILL IN YES 0 ON TESTER AMENDMENT – 1 QUESTION QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE Call Senators Mikulski, Shelby, and Reid and your own two senators.
Message to Senators Mikulski, Reid, and Shelby: I do not support Given the Secretary of Agriculture the Power to Ignore the Courts on GMO Seed Planting – Please Allow a Vote on Senator Tester’s Amendment 74 (Or simple strike Section 735 from the bill.)
Message to Your Two Senators: I do not support Given the Secretary of Agriculture the Power to Ignore the Courts on GMO Seed Planting – Please Vote to Support Senator Tester’s Amendment 74 to Strike Section 735.
Time is crucial on this. Senator Reid wants to vote on Monday – so we need to get calls in today and Monday morning – and the survey by the end of the weekend.
Senator Mikulski (202) 224-4654
Senator Shelby (202) 224-5744
Senator Reid (202) 224-3542
All other numbers at: http://www.senate.gov/”
The Issue: Section 735 of the Senate Version of HR 933 (The Appropriations Bill That Will Keep the Government Funded Through September 30.) This provision is intended to give the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to ignore court rulings barring the planting of GMO seeds. Monsanto, Bayer, and others (with the Gate Foundation an major stockholder of Monsanto doing a lot of lobbying) want to get their seeds planted without proving safety
The Solution: Senate Amendment 74 introduced by Senator Jon Tester with Senators Leahy, Gillibrand,Boxer, Begich, and Blumenthal would strike Section 735
Another Action Item – but time is running out:
Everyone Should Take the One Question Survey Posted at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GMOProvisioninBudgetBill
You can also insert it on your facebook or webpage by using: Click here to take survey
I am outraged and laughing at the manipulations and fear tactics of the FDA. It just posted a Friday Food Safety notice to be wary of raw sprouts because of the risk of food borne illness such as salmonella and E. coli. They claim that there have been 30 reported outbreaks within the past 16 years and that the problem is with the seed itself. They caution even home grown sprouts including alfalfa, clover, radish, and mung beans.) They also caution people with challenged immune systems, children and pregnant women to not eat sprouts raw or lightly cooked.
Such BS. The problems come with the chicken, bat, and cow manure in the sol used or leaking downstream into water sources used. This comment is based on 30 reports over 16 years – what about the 100 million plus instances where people have eaten sprouts and not only boosted their immune systems and helped challenge certain diseases but also went away healthy with smiles. I wonder if the FDA has ever posted reports from years ago that a rumored 240 deaths a day are traced to meat consumption –opps, gotta be careful of the meat industry.
The POP Campaign is conducting more research to address the details in case this mushrooms into a huge strategy of control or regulation – or setting the stage for massive GE planting of sprouts.
MONSANTO SLOWED – SAY THANKS NOW: The POP Campaign’s Mom of 4 in DC, Beth Clay, spoke with Senator Mikulski’s Office recently on pulling the Monsanto Rider out of the Appropriations Bill. GREAT NEWS is that Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Chair of Appropriation Committee, is willing to do this (H.J.RES.59) We @ the POP Campaign are very strategic and pragmatic -right now – we want you to THANK HER – NOW – Please Go to her web-site & thank her & show it matters – www.mikulski.senate.gov/contact/. (H.J.RES.59) She needs to know people around the country support this action. Tough to call right now but if you want to: (202) 224-4654.
This is only a 3 month extension and the larger efforts to share what we know will be in November and December. More and more people are concerned about the Genetically Engineered contamination of our food chain; however, the other major issue that has surfaced here is the Constitutionality of the Rider when it flies in the face of Judicial authority.
YES! YES !YES! -Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has introduced an amendment to the 2013 farm bill that, for the first time ever, supports for labeling of Genetically Engineered foods The Senate is taking up the Farm Bill now and voting on amendments beginning this week. Ask them to support the amendment. Call your Senators – Find your Senator’s name and number here(http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm) . Or, you can just call them at the Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.
GMO LABELING FOOD FIGHT HEATS UP IN CONGRESS – LET’S MAKE HISTORY TOGETHER AND GET THIS DONE -STAY TUNED
ALL OF OUR EFFORTS ARE COMING TO A HEAD NOW IN CONGRESS – WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED AS WE PREPARE TO HAVE OUR VOICES HEARD BIG TIME –
MEDIA RELEASE: Boxer, DeFazio Introduce Bill to Require Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods
More than 90 Percent of Americans Support the Right to Know What Is In The Foods We Feed Our Families
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR) today introduced the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act, legislation that would require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to clearly label genetically engineered (GE) foods so that consumers can make informed choices about what they eat.
Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Mark Begich (D-AK), Jon Tester (D-MT), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Martin Heinrich (D-NM) are cosponsors of the Senate bill.
Representatives Jared Polis (D-CO), Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Donna Christensen (D-Virgin Islands), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Peter Welch (D-VT), James Moran (D-VA), Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Don Young (R-AK), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Gerry Connolly (D-VA), George Miller (D-CA), David Cicilline (D-RI), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) and Ann Kuster (D-NH) are cosponsors of the House bill.
“Americans have the right to know what is in the food they eat so they can make the best choices for their families,” Senator Boxer said. “This legislation is supported by a broad coalition of consumer groups, businesses, farmers, fishermen and parents who all agree that consumers deserve more – not less – information about the food they buy.”
“When American families purchase food, they deserve to know if that food was genetically engineered in a laboratory,” Representative DeFazio said. “This legislation is supported by consumer’s rights advocates, family farms, environmental organizations, and businesses, and it allows consumers to make an informed choice.”
“Despite the prevalence of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in grocery stores and prepared foods, it remains difficult if not impossible for consumers to determine if the foods they eat contain GMOs,” Representative Polis said. “This labeling bill is about empowering consumers: consumers can chose to eat or not eat GMOs, or to pay more or less for GMOs. I believe consumers have a right to know what they are eating so they can make their own informed food choices. I am proud to be working toward more informative food labels.”
“Food is a basic necessity in our everyday lives, and people have a right to know what’s in the food that we eat,” Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard said. “I have long been an advocate of labeling food containing GE products because consumers deserve honest, transparent information about their food. This legislation puts consumers first and will empower them to make informed choices for themselves and their families.”
“GMO labeling is an issue I’ve cared deeply about for a long time and is one of the things I hear most often about from constituents,” Congresswoman Pingree said. “I think people have a right to know exactly what they’re feeding themselves and their families. The choice of whether to eat GMO food is best left to the consumer–but there’s no choice to make if we don’t provide them the information.”
According to surveys, more than 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of genetically engineered foods. In fact, many consumers are surprised to learn that GE foods are not already labeled.
Currently, the FDA requires the labeling of over 3,000 ingredients, additives and processes, but the agency has resisted labels for genetically modified foods. In a 1992 policy statement, the FDA allowed GE foods to be marketed without labeling, claiming that these foods were not “materially” different from other foods because the genetic differences could not be recognized by taste, smell or other senses.
Unfortunately, the FDA’s antiquated labeling policy has not kept pace with 21st century food technologies that allow for a wide array of genetic and molecular changes to food that can’t be detected by human senses. Common sense would indicate that GE corn that produces its own insecticide – or is engineered to survive being doused by herbicides – is materially different from traditional corn that does not. Even the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has recognized that these foods are materially different and novel for patent purposes.
Consumers – who are used to reading labels to see if foods contain MSG, gluten, trans fats, high fructose corn syrup or aspartame – clearly want more information. More than one and a half million Americans have filed comments with the FDA urging the agency to label GE foods.
The bipartisan legislation introduced today would require clear labels for genetically engineered whole foods and processed foods, including fish and seafood. The measure would direct the FDA to write new labeling standards that are consistent with U.S. labeling standards and international standards.
Sixty-four countries around the world already require the labeling of GE foods, including all the member nations of the European Union, Russia, Japan, China, Australia and New Zealand.
This legislation follows last year’s letter from Senator Boxer, Representative DeFazio and 54 Senate and House lawmakers urging the FDA to require the labeling of GE foods.