What We Do

Green Your SPIRIT and The Hippocrates Health Institute launched the POP Campaign to keep our voices and choices alive, keep organic standards pure, keep ourselves and others informed and educated and take action to preserve organic power and purity...

read more

UPDATE!!!

Exciting Pre-Launch: MOMS4POP supports the education and research of The POP Campaign. MOMS4POP is a fundraising strategy where Moms can support the research and educational efforts of the POP Campaign while establishing a revenue stream for themselves.

read more

The Truth About Health Conference – NYC 1/10- 1/12

Saturday, January 11, 2014 @ 06:01 PM
posted by Rudi

This conference is one of the finest in a long time, Sponsored by the Hippocrates Health Institute and Steve Shore – absolutely fantastic perspective on food and health.

http://www.therealtruthabouthealthseminar.com

Dr Gabriel Cousens & Dr Brian Clement – GE Food linked to Birth Defects

Monday, October 28, 2013 @ 05:10 PM
posted by admin

see  http://moms4pop.org Dr Gabriel Cousens and Dr Brian Clement – Geneticall Engineered Food Linked with Iodine Deficiency and Congenital Birth Defects: Toxic Halogens called “salts” hidden behind the GE non-disclosure veil.     by Rabbi Gabriel Cousens, MD, MD(H), Dr. Brian Clement, Nonnie Crystal and Rudhi Lenardi (POP Campaign)

As pioneers of the vibrant, alive blueprint for health at the Tree of Life Center U.S. and Hippocrates Health Institute, The POP Campaign strives to protect the healthy lifestyle threshold against the tsunami of genetically modified organisms (GMO) for the article see: http://moms4pop.org

Experiment

 

 

 

UNVEILED – GMO Skeleton Donors

Tuesday, October 22, 2013 @ 03:10 PM
posted by Rudi

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Mark Kastel, 608-625-2042

Unveiled: GMO Labeling Opponents
Come Out of the Shadows

Natural/Organic Brands No Longer Hiding
Behind Lobbying Organization

CORNUCOPIA, WI: Proposition I-522, a citizen’s initiative on the November 5 ballot in Washington state that would mandate clear labeling of genetically engineered (GE) ingredients on food packages, has become the most expensive initiative campaign in the state’s history. The high-priced battleground is pitting consumer and farmer advocates against multi-billion-dollar agribusiness corporations.

A number of new opponents to the GMO food labeling proposal were recently revealed following the release of their names by the Grocery Manufacturers Association(GMA), a national business lobbying organization. The GMA had been, apparently in violation of state election law, hiding the identity of its donors who had provided more than $7.2 million to fight the consumer’s right to know what is in their food. The disclosure came shortly after Washington’s Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a lawsuit demanding the GMA reveal the identity of its secret donors.

With the outing of the GMA’s donors, The Cornucopia Institute has released an updated infographic detailing the financial expenditures of corporate and organizational supporters and opponents of I-522.

“Consumers might be surprised to find out that some of their favorite organic and natural brands, hiding behind their lobbyist, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, are contributing bushel baskets of cash towards thwarting their right to make informed choices in the supermarket,” says Mark Kastel, Cornucopia’s Codirector.

A similar GMO labeling measure, Prop 37, was narrowly defeated in California last year, with GMA, Monsanto and their allies pouring more than $46 million into their campaign and outspending labeling supporters by five to one. Many prominent organic and natural brands were also exposed in California by Cornucopia for their opposition to GMO food labeling.

“We think the bad press and consumer outrage that many of the GMA member companies received in California, like Kellogs (Kashi), General Mills (Cascadian Farms/Muir Glen) and Smucker’s (Santa Cruz and Knudsen), led to the decision to try to clandestinely hide under the GMA’s cloak with its secret donor approach,” noted Kastel.

The Cornucopia infographic also outlines dozens of organic brands that have heavily contributed to the YES on I-522 campaign, including Dr Bronner’s, Nature’s Path, Annie’s, Stonyfield Farm and Nutiva. It is thought that after the dust settled in California, these groups gained respect and market share after some of the prominent, agribusiness-owned brands lost favor with politically savvy consumers.

A number of prominent organizations have also substantially contributed in support of consumer rights, including the Organic Consumers Association, Center for Food Safety, Mercola.com, Presence Marketing, PCC Natural Markets and Food Democracy Now!.

Earlier this year, the GMA publicly scrubbed its website of its members, a move thought by many to be an effort to mask which corporations/brands were helping underwrite corporate donations against I-522. They weren’t, however, able to remove this web archive detailing their membership.

“In addition to the many companies supporting a YES vote on I-522, there are thousands of individuals making small donations to fund the pro-labeling campaign,” said Goldie Caughlan, a retired nutrition educator for PCC Natural Markets in Seattle and former member of the National Organic Standards Board. “Out-of-state interests, like Monsanto and the many identified GMA members, are flooding our airwaves with misleading ads telling Washington residents how to vote,” Caughlan added.

Mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food at the state level is viewed as a watershed event by many industry observers, given the inaction on the popular proposal at the federal level – with polls showing as high as a 90% in support. Lobbyists for Monsanto, its biotech allies, and GMA in particular, have been credited with bottlenecking a federal labeling law.

After the industry advertising blitz, the most recent polling of Washington state voters indicates a tightening race on the I-522 initiative, with a narrow majority supporting labeling of GMO food ingredients. Opponents of the measure have raised in excess of $17.1 million. The GMA’s share of the NO vote dollar alone, at $7.2 million, is greater than all of the money raised by I-522 supporters, who have collected nearly $6.9 million in favor of a YES vote.

“Consumers and food citizens are increasingly interested in ‘voting with their forks,’ and many want to support companies that share their values,” observes Jason Cole, a researcher for Cornucopia who compiled the data for the infographic. “We think these conscious eaters will appreciate the infographic created by Cornucopia to help them make their purchasing decisions.”

A GENERATION RAPED – The PROMISCUITY of Genetically Engineered Crops

Sunday, September 29, 2013 @ 11:09 AM
posted by Rudi

SMART VIDEO that supports the POP Campaign’s efforts to end the promiscuity tendencies of Genetic Engineered Crops raping our minerals and nutrients from our organic plants. Save our children, jail glyphosate as the perpetrator – Dr. Huber is a solid scientist – stay tuned :)  Dr. Huber has the depth of 50 years as a researcher – he underscores the huge economic monopoly and money making values behind GE food at the expense of us humans as experiments. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrq_1ovWlVE

FINAL LET’S GET FOLKS THERE: The POP Campaign is co-hosting Dr. Brian Clement with the yummy THRIVE Restaurant in Seattle. Dr. Brian, Director of the Hippocrates Health Institute, will be speaking about the healthy, vibrant lifestyle of living foods and updates on GMO Labeling and the Proposition 522 Labeling Efforts int he State of Washington. An amazing opportunity to learn cutting edge health information and elevate your game. USE PROMO CODE FOR A DISCOUNT : THRIVE20 – BASTYR UNIVERSITY AUDITORIUM – sign up: @http://www.generationthrive.com/events Dr. Brian Clement flyerScreen Shot 2013-07-19 at 8.45.09 PM

We are powerful as a group and must continue to educate people to stand up for their rights to label Genetically Engineered Foods – the GMO industry has been nervous and met in Washington to discuss ways to fight back, throw more money to counter efforts and to strategize for a national labeling bill – we wait and ask for support for our efforts. See the article in the Hill:

Key summit set in genetically modified food label fight – By Ben Goad –


Major players in the food industry have scheduled a crucial meeting for next week that could become a turning point in the regulatory battle over genetically modified foods.
Challenges to the use of biotechnology have created an “unprecedented period of turmoil” for food producers, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) said in a letter circulated among trade groups that was obtained by The Hill.
“We have reached a pivotal point in this effort and believe now is the time to bring together a broad coalition to confront these challenges,” the GMA wrote in the letter, which invited CEOs and top industry officials to a Wednesday summit in Washington.
Just how the food industry might move forward appears up for debate. Though organizers of the GMA summit were tight-lipped, advocates and industry officials said the options could ultimately range from a coordinated attack against labels to acceptance of a national standard.
The GMA’s membership list includes more than 300 companies, including food giants Kraft Foods, Coca Cola and General Mills. The group declined to discuss the meeting or whether it would propose a particular strategy.
“As the policy debate surrounding this issue moves forward, GMA will continue to work with its supply chain partners to inform lawmakers and consumers about the significant negative impacts such labeling requirements will have on both businesses and consumers,” the group said in a written statement to The Hill.
Opponents of mandatory labeling argue that foods made with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are perfectly healthy and indistinguishable from “natural” products. Labels could create a false perception that the foods are somehow inferior, they say, and create a stigma that causes prices to rise.
For years, farmers have planted herbicide resistant or “roundup ready” corn, cotton and soybeans that can be easily sprayed for weeds. The genetically modified crops are used in a variety of popular processed foods, including soft drinks, margarine and breakfast cereal.
Food safety and public interest groups question claims that GMOs are safe, arguing the science is inconclusive. They have pressed for all GMO foods to be labeled so that consumers are aware of what that they’re eating.
The fight over labels is increasingly being waged at the state level — and at substantial cost to foodstuff manufacturers.
Last year, major chemical and food companies spent more than $40 million in California to defeat a ballot measure that called for mandatory labels of all scientifically engineered foods sold in the state.
Similar labeling proposals have popped up in more than two-dozen states and in Congress, and the industry group says it cannot afford to fight them all.
“Today consumers have a high degree of confidence in the safety of the U.S. food supply,” the GMA wrote in the letter. But that confidence could be eroded, the GMA warned, by 25 proposals pending in state legislatures, a ballot initiative on deck in Washington State, and the federal push for mandatory labels.
Thus far, two state legislatures — Maine and Connecticut — have approved legislation requiring labels on genetically modified foods. Governors in both states are expected to sign the bills, according to Colin O’Neil, director of government affairs at the Center for Food Safety.
O’Neil’s group has pressed the Food and Drug Administration to act unilaterally on regulations for GMO labels since a legislative mandate is unlikely to pass Congress. The FDA has not responded to the request.
Interests on both sides of the debate are watching the Washington initiative closely. Adoption of state labeling laws could subject food companies to a patchwork of regulations that would be far more costly than a federal standard, O’Neil said.
“These companies would like to see any language that would preempt state law,” he said. “A federal standard would likely do that.”
O’Neil said industry concerns over state level action, therefore, have long begged the question: “When does the labeling fight come to D.C.?”
Some industry sources said they viewed Wednesday’s meeting as a significant event, but declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issues at hand.
Officials from the Produce Marketing Association were among those invited, though they would not be able to attend, spokeswoman Meg Miller said.
As for the group’s expectations of what the result might be: “We don’t have any at this point,” she said.

URGENT CALL TODAY – STOP GMO PROVISION TO BY-PASS THE COURTS

Monday, March 18, 2013 @ 08:03 AM
posted by Rudi

URGENT * URGENT * URGENT GMO ISSUE IN CONGRESS – CALL SENATORS AND – FILL IN YES 0 ON TESTER AMENDMENT – 1 QUESTION QUESTIONNAIRE
**********
PLEASE Call Senators Mikulski, Shelby, and Reid and your own two senators.

Message to Senators Mikulski, Reid, and Shelby: I do not support Given the Secretary of Agriculture the Power to Ignore the Courts on GMO Seed Planting – Please Allow a Vote on Senator Tester’s Amendment 74 (Or simple strike Section 735 from the bill.)

Message to Your Two Senators: I do not support Given the Secretary of Agriculture the Power to Ignore the Courts on GMO Seed Planting – Please Vote to Support Senator Tester’s Amendment 74 to Strike Section 735.

Time is crucial on this. Senator Reid wants to vote on Monday – so we need to get calls in today and Monday morning – and the survey by the end of the weekend.

Telephone Numbers:
Senator Mikulski (202) 224-4654
Senator Shelby (202) 224-5744
Senator Reid (202) 224-3542

All other numbers at: http://www.senate.gov/”
*************
The Issue: Section 735 of the Senate Version of HR 933 (The Appropriations Bill That Will Keep the Government Funded Through September 30.) This provision is intended to give the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to ignore court rulings barring the planting of GMO seeds. Monsanto, Bayer, and others (with the Gate Foundation an major stockholder of Monsanto doing a lot of lobbying) want to get their seeds planted without proving safety

The Solution: Senate Amendment 74 introduced by Senator Jon Tester with Senators Leahy, Gillibrand,Boxer, Begich, and Blumenthal would strike Section 735

Another Action Item – but time is running out:

Everyone Should Take the One Question Survey Posted at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GMOProvisioninBudgetBill

You can also insert it on your facebook or webpage by using: Click here to take survey

WHAT? SPROUTS?

Friday, January 4, 2013 @ 01:01 PM
posted by Rudi

I am outraged and laughing at the manipulations and fear tactics of the FDA. It just posted a Friday Food Safety notice to be wary of raw sprouts because of the risk of food borne illness such as salmonella and E. coli. They claim that there have been 30 reported outbreaks within the past 16 years and that the problem is with the seed itself. They caution even home grown sprouts including alfalfa, clover, radish, and mung beans.) They also caution people with challenged immune systems, children and pregnant women to not eat sprouts raw or lightly cooked.

Such BS. The problems come with the chicken, bat, and cow manure in the sol used or leaking downstream into water sources used. This comment is based on 30 reports over 16 years – what about the 100 million plus instances where people have eaten sprouts and not only boosted their immune systems and helped challenge certain diseases but also went away healthy with smiles. I wonder if the FDA has ever posted reports from years ago that a rumored 240 deaths a day are traced to meat consumption –opps, gotta be careful of the meat industry.

The POP Campaign is conducting more research to address the details in case this mushrooms into a huge strategy of control or regulation – or setting the stage for massive GE planting of sprouts.

http://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/types/fruits/sprouts.html?utm_medium=govdelivery&utm_source=campaign&utm_campaign=food-safe-fridays&utm_content=sprouts

MONSANTO SLOWED – Senate Members more Aware

Wednesday, September 25, 2013 @ 04:09 PM
posted by Rudi

MONSANTO SLOWED – SAY THANKS NOW: The POP Campaign’s Mom of 4 in DC, Beth Clay, spoke with Senator Mikulski’s Office recently on pulling the Monsanto Rider out of the Appropriations Bill. GREAT NEWS is that Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Chair of Appropriation Committee, is willing to do this (H.J.RES.59)  We @ the POP Campaign are very strategic and pragmatic -right now – we want you to THANK HER – NOW – Please Go to her web-site & thank her &  show it matters – www.mikulski.senate.gov/contact/.  (H.J.RES.59)  She needs to know people around the country support this action. Tough to call right now but if you want to: (202) 224-4654.

This is only a 3 month extension and the larger efforts to share what we know will be in November and December. More and more people are concerned about the Genetically Engineered contamination of our food chain; however, the other major issue that has surfaced here is the Constitutionality of the Rider when it flies in the face of Judicial authority.SAY NO

Sunday, September 15, 2013 @ 06:09 PM
posted by Rudi

YES! YES !YES! -Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has introduced an amendment to the 2013 farm bill that, for the first time ever, supports for labeling of Genetically Engineered foods The Senate is taking up the Farm Bill now and voting on amendments beginning this week. Ask them to support the amendment. Call your Senators – Find your Senator’s name and number here(http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm) . Or, you can just call them at the Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.